Our core Expertise

Aside from conflict dynamics, bicc is concerned with the causes and repercussions of violent conflicts. This approach allows us to go beyond the immediate concerns of violent conflicts and analyse the intricate characteristics that will influence violent conflicts of tomorrow. We are equally concerned with establishing knowledge to help transform or stop violent conflict and reduce the levels of actual violence levels. Prevention is also a key area of interest.

Any distinction between the "conditions", "dynamics", and "consequences" of violent conflicts is highly artificial and abstract. All three dimensions frequently interact strongly with one another, making it difficult to separate them along the implied linear, chronological axis.

The fundamental rationale for employing them is to broaden the scope of studying violent conflicts beyond the mere exchange of violence between opposing sides. They are the foundation for identifying our research and advisory work's general lines and objectives.

Conditions, dynamics and consequences of violent conflicts

The term “conditions of violent conflict” refers to all the factors that contribute to and enable violent conflict—during, before and after the outbreak of violence. Three factors are important here:

First, societal inequalities, among other factors, can lead to violent conflict. For example, environmental changes and socioeconomic structures can cause or sustain conflict.

Second, degrees of social coherence and fragmentation are related to the likelihood of violent conflict. Conflicts are frequently fuelled by political polarisation, radicalisation and nationalist, racist, patriarchal and dehumanising worldviews in societies. This can be exemplified by symbolic practises that legitimise either direct violence or the reproduction of

inequalities based on, for example, wealth, gender, sexuality, ethnic positioning or other perceived differences.

Third, violent conflict between groups of people necessitates the development, establishment and control of the means and institutions necessary for using physical force. This encompasses a range of weapon systems, military technologies, armed forces, police and non-state armed groups.

Thus, the material resources and structures of organised violence, deliberate policies, social inequalities and hate speech create the conditions for violent conflict. The objective of bicc is to investigate the intricate interrelationships between all of these enabling factors. In doing so, the aim is to gain a deeper understanding of the development and persistence of violent conflicts and enhance the capacity for early warning, strategic foresight, and prevention.

“Dynamics of violent conflict“ are shaped by actual acts of violence and their connections to shifting social relations and power structures. This includes the concrete actions of various actors, whether they are direct participants in the conflict and the broader policies and strategies that shape them. Third-party international or transnational involvement in conflict-affected contexts, such as humanitarian relief efforts, development programmes, peacebuilding initiatives or military or police interventions, may be the object of research. The mobilisation and operations of armed groups, changing military theories, civil–military interactions and the usage of weapons systems and technologies may also be examined in this topic.

One goal of bicc's research into the dynamics of violent conflicts is to uncover the factors that explain the intensification or de-escalation and cessation of violence. The knowledge gained may inform the design of more effective

strategies for ensuring nonviolent conflict resolution, such as enhancing arms control and developing new mechanisms for communication, reconciliation and peacebuilding between opposing parties.

The short- and long-term effects of violence and the various challenges they produce are referred to as the “consequences of violent conflicts”. These consequences may not always relate to a time 'after' the violent conflict but rather to all the immediate and indirect effects of a specific act of violence, including social inequalities.

During the conflict, the civilian population bears the brunt of the destruction, which is deliberately targeted. Women, for example, are often affected differently than men by violent conflict. LGBTQIA+ people may also experience conflict in ways that heterosexual and cis people do not. The aftermath of large-scale violent conflict extends beyond the immediate and short-term consequences, affecting communities over long periods and across vast distances, sometimes traumatising entire generations. Forced displacement following conflicts in Ukraine, the Middle East, and Sub-Saharan Africa has also been felt in bicc's home state of North Rhine-Westphalia, although to a considerably lesser extent.

The social orders that emerge from conflict and violence may produce structural inequalities, discursive constructs and policies that set the conditions for future outbreaks of violence. It is our hope that the recommendations we provide on dealing with the aftermath of violence will increase the possibilities for long-term peace by investigating the multiple ramifications of violent conflict.

bicc specialises in conducting research and providing advisory services on the intricate matters related to violent conflict. Our primary areas of focus encompass:

Topics and Dimensions in Violent Conflict Research 

It is important to note that while these specific topics may not encompass all aspects related to gaining a thorough understanding of violent conflict, they have been selected based on our internal expertise, research interests and preferred approach. These five topics serve as the central focus for bicc's ongoing project work and guide our strategy in seeking new projects between 2024 and 2028.

Several of these may be pertinent to the conditions or outcomes associated with violent conflict, whereas others focus more on the actual dynamics of the conflict.